The “serial position effect” describes how list items that are first and last in a list are more likely to be remembered than the items in the middle.
Furthermore, the medium of the list, how fast the list items are presented, and the time between exposure and decision, will greatly affect which is better: being first or being last.
The primacy effect describes the likelihood of remembering items that are first on a list – items presented first on a list are stored in long-term memory more easily than items further down the list (“Storage Mechanisms in Recall”, M. Glanzer, 1972).
When presenting list items to your users in video or audio (or any format where they don’t control the pace), beware that the faster you present the less your items will be stored in long-term memory. The primacy effect only occur when list items are presented slowly or at the user’s own pace.
The recency effect describes the likelihood of remembering items that are last on a list – items that are last on a list are still in working memory (“Two storage mechanisms in Free Recall”, M. Glanzer, 1966). There are two interesting characteristics of the recency effect:
The following graph compares the concepts of the primacy and recency effect:
You should take advantage of this knowledge when presenting information in lists (be it a set of links, your sales pitch, a feature list, client list, etc.).
Here’s some ideas on how to use the primacy and recency effect in practice:
You should also be aware of the primacy and recency effects if you conduct surveys or otherwise have people choose from a long list, as they can represent a margin of error. The “evil” researcher can use it to manipulate the outcome of a survey to his desires, the honest researcher will shuffle the list positions for each vote.
Join 24,000+ readers and get Baymard’s research articles by RSS feed or
Topics include user experience, web design, and e-commerce
Articles are always delivered ad-free and in their full length
1-click unsubscribe at any time
Do you have a recommendation for length of lists? I know that 7 is the number of items you can store short term, but I feel that is too many. I feel like 3 or 4 items in a list is just about enough….thoughts??
it’s right that the primacy and recency effects in surveys for example can represent a margin of error. I worked for several surveys companies when I was a Sociology student and (despite the fact they don’t want to admite it) a part of the questions with a long list could be a serious bias in the results.
For marketing and sales, based on my experience I think that the final item could have a biggest effect (most choosen item) and in my work, sometimes, I use this effect to add at the end of the list (so bottom of the list) the main attractive item (ex. North European who prefer the South of France) becasue I know that the users will go to the last item and I know that they will read the first too.
But with a long term strategic vision (brand Impregnation for ex.) probably that the primacy effect could be used to add a very important and strategic information (like brand values) in long term memory. The values associated with a positive cognitive / affective marker will offer a best User EXperience in the buying process and in the relationship between User / custome & brand.
for dissociation between cognition and affect you can read the articles of Antonio Damiaso (great to best understand what is cognition and affect and how their interact) http://www.labome.org/expert/usa/university/damasio/antonio-damasio-428903.html
Thanks for sharing. Interesting read.
What tests were used?
© 2021 Baymard Institute US: +1 (315) 216-7151 EU: +45 3696 9567 firstname.lastname@example.org