Electronic Components & Machinery

Electronic Components & Machinery UX Research

Understand how technical buyers navigate large catalogs, compare specifications and evaluate parts. Baymard’s B2B electronic components and machinery research examines manufacturer and distributor experiences, with guidelines and examples for product tables, filtering, detailed information and the wider purchasing journey.

Book a demo call

Make sense of specification-heavy buying journeys

A technically suitable component can remain hard to find when its specifications are difficult to compare. This research examines the details of product tables, filtering and product information alongside the broader manufacturer or distributor experience. Use the findings to discuss how interfaces support buyers working with precise requirements.

Examples of electronic components and machinery websites studied by Baymard

Key UX challenges for electronic components and machinery

Desktop product tables

Explore why technical buyers benefit from structured product tables when evaluating many specifications, and how the findings differ from the needs of mobile layouts.

Read the research

Searching long filter lists

See research on finding exact values within extensive technical filters, including the difficulties users encounter when a needed specification is buried among many options.

Read the research

Current manufacturer and distributor examples

Read the 2026 benchmark release for six additional industry case studies, showing how current desktop and mobile implementations were assessed against research-based UX criteria.

Read the research

Electronic components and machinery research, in numbers

These figures describe the current electronic components and machinery research collection.

290+

Components and machinery UX guidelines

7,000+

Components and machinery UX performance scores

6,000+

Components and machinery best practice examples

B2B Electronic Components & Machinery

Baymard’s UX research provides you with 290+ UX guidelines for B2B Electronic Components & Machinery ecommerce sites, along with 7,000+ UX performance scores and 6,000+ best practice examples from B2B Electronic Components & Machinery sites.

The 290+ guidelines cover most aspects of the online exploration and purchasing of electronic components and machinery, at both a high level of general user behavior as well as at a more granular level of specific issues users are likely to encounter.

The research includes large-scale usability testing and UX benchmarking of B2B Electronic Components & Machinery ecommerce sites such as:
Analog Devices, Arrow Electronics, Avnet, Bossard, CoreStaff, Digi-Key Electronics,
7 × Themes

How the electronic components and machinery research was conducted

The study includes manufacturer and distributor sites such as Analog Devices, Microchip Technology, Arrow Electronics and DigiKey. Usability testing examines how technical buyers explore catalogs and assess products, with particular attention to detailed specifications, product tables and the filtering tools used to narrow alternatives.

Manual benchmarking adds documented implementation examples and performance scores from 17 industry sites. These case studies connect the research to desktop and mobile interfaces, allowing teams to examine specific design choices within manufacturers’ and distributors’ product-finding experiences.

The findings also draw on Baymard’s wider ecommerce research, including moderated think-aloud testing, selected eye-tracking and quantitative studies. This broader foundation helps explain how observed behavior informs the guidelines and their application.

Read about the study

Read our research methodology

Explore electronic components and machinery UX benchmarks

Explore manufacturer and distributor case studies including Arrow Electronics, DigiKey, Mouser and Fastenal. Use the benchmark to examine technical catalog patterns and documented product information, with a demo showing how examples and research guidelines can support your team’s decisions.

Book a demo call

Browse electronic components and machinery UX benchmarks

Illustration of Baymard electronic components and machinery UX benchmarking and site comparisons

How teams use Baymard’s research

Testimonials
Ace Hardware Logo
“I’m an avid user of your reports and recommendations. I have leveraged your articles and findings throughout my career in B2B, B2C, and hospitality.”

Jenny Urban

User Experience Director at Ace Hardware

Testimonials
Kingfisher PLC Logo
“The Baymard E-commerce Usability reports have proven to be a valuable resource for UX teams within our organisation both at group and operating company level. The reports contain precise, actionable insights and recommendations which are backed up by extensive research and data. The severity and frequency ratings have helped our development teams to prioritise which areas to improve first. The most recent improvements we’ve recommended from the Ecommerce Search report have been extremely well received by senior stakeholders and have already been fed into the backlog.”

Claire White

UX Specialist for Kingfisher PLC

Testimonials
Office Depot Logo
“Baymard has been a great resource in helping us improve the customer experience. We are continually applying these best practices to our sites.”

Bryan Trogdon

Director of User Experience at Office Depot

Looking for an expert review of your site?

Baymard’s electronic components and machinery UX audit applies the research to an expert review of your own experience.

Explore electronic components and machinery UX audits

See the electronic components and machinery research in action

Book a demo to explore how the guidelines, examples and benchmarks can support your electronic components and machinery UX decisions.

Compare research access options