Navigation
Navigation
E-Commerce Search Usability
Exploring the customer’s search experience
An original research study by Baymard Institute
After months of user testing and research, the most in-depth usability study on e-commerce search logic and design is ready.
Full access to the Search Usability study include both a 297-page report with 60 actionable guidelines, and a benchmark database with 3,000 UX performance scores and 1,600 implementation examples.
This research-based and pragmatic toolset will help you get the best possible on-site search experience and conversion rate.
“Baymard produces some of the most relevant and actionable user experience research available. They really understand the needs of UX and Product Management professionals, and their deep experience in the eCommerce field allows them to offer sophisticated, nuanced insights.”
Report: 60 Research Driven Guidelines on Perfecting E-Commerce Search
This original usability study focuses on how users search on e-commerce websites. A group of users age 21-56 were recruited to test 19 leading e-commerce sites across 8 different verticals. Despite testing multi-million dollar sites, more than 700 search-specific usability issues arose during testing. All these issues have been analyzed and distilled into 60 guidelines on search usability.
From this research study you’ll learn exactly what users expect as they perform searches on e-commerce sites, what typically goes wrong in the process, why it goes wrong, and exactly what changes to make to avoid these issues. In short: how to design a high-performing search experience for your users. After all, if users can’t find what they are searching for, they can’t buy it from you.
While many of the 60 guidelines will be on search logic, more than half of the guidelines are simple design and interaction changes for the search field, autocomplete functionality, and the search results page, as these elements proved to have just as crucial an impact on the user’s ability to find what they were looking for.
What you’ll get in the Search Usability report
“I can not tell you how much help your benchmark studies have been for our company, e-commerce and UX teams. We have used and continue to use these reports for baseline benchmarks as we build test protocols or eye tracking scripts etc in lab.”
Table of contents
- Introduction 10 pages
-
Guideline categories:
- Query Types 50 pages 12 different types of search queries that users make on e-commerce sites, all vital for your search engine to support
- Search Form & Logic 42 pages 10 guidelines on the design and behavior of the search field itself, query persistence, search scope selection, etc.
- Autocomplete 24 pages 7 guidelines on how autocomplete should be designed, the types of suggestions it should make, keyboard behavior, etc.
- Results Logic & Guidance 33 pages 8 guidelines on how to guide users toward better paths, including suggesting new queries, scopes, ‘No results’ pages, etc.
- Results Layout 48 pages 8 guidelines on the layout and features of the search results page, such as dynamic list layouts, results information, search snippets, and pagination
- Results Filtering & Sorting 68 pages 15 guidelines on filtering and sorting of search results, including essential filtering types, faceted search, truncation, filter naming, dynamic sorting, etc.
- Case Studies 11 reviews Including Walmart, Build.com, Etsy, Rakuten, Nordstrom, Sears, and Home Depot
- Checklist for all 60 guidelines 5 pages
- Methodology, Authors, etc. 6 pages
“The Baymard reports have proven to be an invaluable resource for us. Comprehensive, pragmatic and actionable. We have redesigned our checkout process and made changes to our category pages based on usability guidelines in the reports.”
Benchmark: Is Your Search Experience Better than Sears’ or Amazon’s?
Based on the findings from the research study we’ve benchmarked the search engine and interfaces of the top 50 grossing e-commerce sites in the US. This provides you with a comprehensive benchmark database with 191 pages reviewed, 1,100+ screenshots, and 1,600+ examples of the 60 search usability guidelines.
The benchmark database is fully integrated with the report and comes bundled as part of the purchase, providing you with 50 case studies from the top e-commerce sites, acting as examples and inspiration on how to implement each of the 60 guidelines in the report.
Furthermore the benchmark database provides a tool for you to review your own site (or your clients’) and compare it directly against the top e-commerce sites.
What You’ll Get in the Search Usability Benchmark
“Excellent tool – looking forward to using it with our other sites and prototypes as they’re developed.”
Compared to other industry reports
| eConsultancy E-Commerce Best Practice | Baymard Institute E-Commerce Search Usability | Forrester Site Search Technology | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pages: | 99 pages | 297 pages | 17 pages |
| Guidelines: | - | 60 guidelines | 13 takeaways |
| Source: | Author’s thoughts | User testing | Comparative study |
| Benchmark: | No | Yes, 50 sites reviewed | No |
| Review tool: | No | Yes, interactive review tool | No |
| Price: | $695 | $200 | $2,495 |
| Refund: | No | Yes, 14 days full refund | Yes, 1 day refund |
“These reports are fabulous. The content is exactly what our team has been looking for, and so much more! Extremely helpful, thank you!”
Get your report and benchmark now
Get instant access to the usability report and benchmark database for $200, and start improving your e-commerce search experience today at just $3.3 per actionable guideline.
Refund policy: We stand by our research and offer you a full 14 days “no questions asked” refund. If you’re not satisfied, simply e-mail us at christian@baymard.com for a full refund.
Report details
| Title: | E-Commerce Search Usability |
|---|---|
| ISBN: | 978-87-994365-4-5 |
| Version: | 1.1.3 (February 2017) |
| Delivery: | Instant PDF-download (DRM-free), 78mb |
| Content: | 297 pages, 60 guidelines |
Benchmark details
The benchmark database has four components:
| Review: | Interactive checklist for reviewing your own sites |
|---|---|
| Guidelines: | 60 usability guidelines with examples from the 50 benchmarked sites |
| Site reviews: | Case studies of the top 50 grossing e-commerce sites |
| Page types: | Navigate 191 search engine designs by type of page |
Report license
The report and Baymard Pro account are intended for internal use - for you and your team.
You and your team are allowed to both print and digitally distribute the report to employees within your own organization (i.e. within the same legal entity), as long as it is not accessible to anyone outside it.
We trust our customers, so all reports we sell are unrestricted – this means that no DRM or other restrictive technologies are used.
Baymard Institute’s research is used by:
“Baymard have been a great resource in helping us improve the customer experience. We are continually applying these best practices to our sites.”
“Intelligent, consumer-focused insights that are clear and actionable. The team in the room really loved the way the Baymard Institute highlighted the optimizations in the various user experience elements (copy, layout, design, calls-to-action…), from the perspective of consumer struggles. Baymard’s Usability research really compliments our other existing research tools.”
“Thank you. This was an excellent piece of work: professional, thorough, and actionable for the team. We're very happy with the work Baymard has done for us so far, and I hope we'll have the chance to work together again on future projects.”
“E-Commerce Search Usability is an essential industry report for anybody in the e-commerce business. This must-read analysis contains many valuable insights summarized by an easy to handle checklist.”
“Thank you for all the value delivered ahead of our new fiscal years. Your insights not only provided a definitive foundation for our UX roadmap but completely sold our executive team on the value of expert usability insights. Your service paid for itself in a matter of days and ensured all critical gaps will be filled ahead of us running the audit again next year.”
