This is a case study of Van Cleef & Arpels’ ecommerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 491 design elements. 343 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the ecommerce UX landscape.
Van Cleef & Arpels’ overall ecommerce UX performance is xxxx xx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xx xxxx xx xxxx xx-xxxx xxxxxx xx xxxxxxxxxx, xxx xxxxxxxxx xx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xx xxxxxxx xx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxx & xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx Upgrade to access Van Cleef & Arpels’ case study.
First benchmarked in April 2021 and reviewed once in February 2024.
Van Cleef & Arpels’ UX Performance upgrade

Benchmark Chart
This UX performance chart is part of Baymard's premium UX research. Create a free account or compare plans to unlock full access for your team.
With a free account you can access:
To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.
22 pages of Van Cleef & Arpels’ ecommerce site, marked up with 214 best practice examples:
20 pages of Van Cleef & Arpels’ ecommerce site, marked up with 198 best practice examples:
Every week, we publish a new article on how to build “state of the art” ecommerce experiences — here’s 5 popular ones:

Drop-Down Usability: When You Should (and Shouldn’t) Use Them

Format the “Expiration Date” Fields Exactly the Same as the Physical Credit Card (72% Don’t)

Avoid Using “Horizontal Tabs” for the Main Product Page Sections (29% Don’t)

Form Field Usability: Avoid Extensive Multicolumn Layouts (16% Make This Form Usability Mistake)

Form Usability: Getting ‘Address Line 2’ Right
See all 462 articles in the full public archive.