Users continue to be concerned about the security and confidentiality of their personal information on the web. This can range from serious concerns over identity theft to more mundane concerns, such as an aversion to receiving marketing phone calls — making users reluctant to hand out personal information.
In particular, our benchmarking reveals that the “Phone Number” field is required during the checkout flow on 97% of the 60 largest e-commerce sites — but 58% of sites don’t provide an explanation for why it’s needed.
During Baymard’s large-scale usability testing, required but unexplained phone fields were observed to be a direct cause of abandonments for the subgroup of users who are suspicious of a site’s motives.
Furthermore, a few other sites also ask users for other personal information during checkout, such as date of birth and gender. Our testing also verifies that this is considered highly personal information for some users, who similarly will refuse to give out this information to complete the checkout.
In this article, we’ll discuss the test findings from our Baymard Premium UX research database, related to required “Phone Number” fields. In particular, we’ll discuss:
Baymard’s quantitative study of over 2,800 online shoppers reveals that 14% of respondents indicated they won’t provide their phone number to complete a checkout.
Yet “Phone Number” is required to complete the checkout at almost all e-commerce sites — making this one field a potential sole cause of abandonment.
Many sites likely don’t think of a user’s phone number as highly sensitive information that users would be reluctant to provide. After all, for many sites the phone number is required for legitimate reasons — for example, many shipping couriers require it in order to process the package, or the site may use it if there are problems with the order or simply to provide text updates on the order status.
Yet this is clearly not the case for 14% of respondents in our quantitative study, for whom being required to provide this information is a “deal breaker”.
Additionally, date of birth and gender — which are required on only 5% of sites — would also lead to many users abandoning the checkout (34% for date of birth and 12% for gender).
Thus, while users are far less likely to encounter required “Date of Birth” and “Gender” fields during checkout, more than twice as many users would be likely to abandon if they’re asked for their date of birth, and roughly as many would be likely to abandon if they’re asked for their gender, compared to the “Phone Number” field.
To further investigate the phone number and privacy issue, we’ve conducted large-scale usability testing to determine how users respond to required phone numbers when faced with the field during an actual checkout flow. The results largely support our findings from the quantitative testing.
Consistently during all our checkout usability studies a large proportion of users voiced strong privacy concerns when required to hand out their phone number.
Clearly, many users have strong feelings regarding providing their phone number. Most users simply don’t intuitively understand why a phone number is necessary, since communication with the e-commerce site is primarily by email, and hence assume the worst — which is that sites want their phone number for marketing or other purposes unrelated to the current order.
During testing we observe that being required to provide a phone number will cause most users to stop and hesitate, but will cause more privacy-concerned users to abandon the site.
Furthermore, when users feel tricked or forced into something, some will respond with creative ways of getting out of the request.
During testing, several users decided to provide a fake phone number, such as the user above who submitted all 9s, in order to get around the site’s requirement. (Submitting a fake phone number is typically observed for more web-savvy test users.)
If the site had a legitimate reason for requesting the phone number — for example, if a phone number is required for delivery purposes by a courier service — then obviously a fake number is highly problematic.
Even worse is if the phone number is used to validate the credit card data. In this case providing a fake number can lead to almost unresolveable card-validation errors, very likely to cause site abandonments.
Sites should therefore first strongly consider whether a phone number is truly necessary to complete the checkout. If it isn’t, it should be made optional or removed.
However, for the vast majority of sites the phone number is likely a legitimate requirement needed to fulfill the user’s order.
Yet interestingly, we’ve also consistently observed during testing that sites that require phone numbers, but simply clearly explain why it’s required and what it will be used for, can alleviate the vast majority of users’ privacy concerns.
One well-performing pattern is simply using a short inline explanation in close proximity to the field, such as “Used in case of delivery issues”, “Used for payment validation”, or “For order questions only”, or whatever the information is actually used for. If a longer description is needed, a tooltip can also be used.
On mobile, the solutions are the same — removing the “Phone Number” field, making it optional, or letting users know how their phone number will be used. Note however that, on mobile devices, tooltip text in particular tends to present issues for users when proper spacing and hit areas are not implemented correctly, so a short inline description will often be a safe choice implementation wise.
Note that the solutions outlined above for the “Phone Number” field also apply to other fields which users may consider to be asking for sensitive information, such as “Date of Birth” and “Gender”. When the information is truly required from users — for example, when there’s a minimum age to view the site, product, forum, or other account-related feature — consider asking just for their age, not their entire date of birth.
The “Phone Number” field is an interesting example of how usability testing can provide a solution to an issue identified during a quantitative study.
Based on the results from our quantitative study, it would seem that requiring users to provide a phone number is simply a bad idea. However, our large-scale usability test sessions proved there’s a simple, low-cost solution that still allows sites to collect this data — offering an explanation for why the phone number is required, to address users’ underlying privacy concerns.
Indeed, several users during testing, facing a required “Phone Number” field, initially responded very negatively and assumed the site was “up to something” (e.g., their number would be used for marketing purposes).
Yet when these same users clicked on a tooltip that described why the phone number was required, it changed their perception of the required field (e.g., “It’s quite good that they want to inform me that the package has now been shipped”).
Yet our benchmark reveals that this easy-to-implement solution is a missed opportunity in e-commerce, as 58% of sites don’t provide an explanation for their required “Phone Number” field during checkout.
This article presents the research findings from just 1 of the 600+ UX guidelines in Baymard Premium – get full access to learn how to create a “State of the Art” e-commerce user experience.
Authored by Edward Scott on March 16, 2020
Join 30,000+ UX professionals and get a new UX article every second week.
See all 60 ‘Cart & Checkout’ articles