This is a case study of Pep Boys’ e-commerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 508 design elements. 213 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the e-commerce UX landscape.
Pep Boys’ overall e-commerce UX performance is poor. Some of Pep Boys’ biggest UX issues are caused by broken On-Site Search, Customer Accounts, and Site-Wide Features & Navigation performances.
Overall UX Performance
516 Guidelines · Performance:
Desktop Web
265 Guidelines · Performance:
Homepage & Category Navigation
27 Guidelines · Performance:
On-Site Search
28 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Lists & Filtering
48 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Page
59 Guidelines · Performance:
Cart & Checkout
78 Guidelines · Performance:
Customer Accounts
16 Guidelines · Performance:
Site-Wide Features & Navigation
9 Guidelines · Performance:
Mobile Web
251 Guidelines · Performance:
To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.
The scatterplot you see above is the free version we make public to all our users. If you wish to dive deeper and learn about each guideline and even review your own site you’ll need to get premium access.
13 pages of Pep Boys’ e-commerce site, marked up with 177 best practice examples:
13 pages of Pep Boys’ e-commerce site, marked up with 184 best practice examples:
Explore similar case studies of Automotive Parts & Specialty sites:
31 page designs: desktop, mobile
30 page designs: desktop, mobile
27 page designs: desktop, mobile
25 page designs: desktop, mobile
28 page designs: desktop, mobile
31 page designs: desktop, mobile
29 page designs: desktop, mobile
30 page designs: desktop, mobile
Every 2nd week, we publish a new article on how to build “state of the art” e-commerce experiences — here’s 5 popular ones:
See all 367 articles in the full public archive.