This is a case study of LEGO’s e-commerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 612 design elements. 213 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the e-commerce UX landscape.
LEGO’s overall e-commerce UX performance is mediocre. Some of LEGO’s biggest UX issues are caused by broken On-Site Search, mediocre Homepage & Category, and mediocre Customer Accounts performances.
First benchmarked in July 8, 2021, and reviewed 5 times since then, most recently June 1, 2023.
Overall UX Performance
866 Guidelines · Performance:
Desktop Web
482 Guidelines · Performance:
Homepage & Category
54 Guidelines · Performance:
On-Site Search
47 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Lists & Filtering
90 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Page
96 Guidelines · Performance:
Cart & Checkout
130 Guidelines · Performance:
Customer Accounts
38 Guidelines · Performance:
Order Tracking & Returns
27 Guidelines · Performance:
Mobile Web
384 Guidelines · Performance:
To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.
The scatterplot you see above is the free version we make public to all our users. If you wish to dive deeper and learn about each guideline and even review your own site you’ll need to get premium access.
21 pages of LEGO’s e-commerce site, marked up with 277 best practice examples:
17 pages of LEGO’s e-commerce site, marked up with 130 best practice examples:
Explore similar case studies of Toys & Crafts sites:
42 page designs: mobile, desktop
43 page designs: desktop, mobile
42 page designs: desktop, mobile
34 page designs: desktop, mobile
41 page designs: desktop, mobile
50 page designs: desktop, mobile
28 page designs: desktop, mobile
35 page designs: desktop, mobile
Every 2nd week, we publish a new article on how to build “state of the art” e-commerce experiences — here’s 5 popular ones:
See all 363 articles in the full public archive.