This is a case study of Booking.com’s ecommerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 580 design elements. 333 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the ecommerce UX landscape.
Booking.com’s overall ecommerce UX performance is xxxx xx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xx xxxx xx xxxx xx-xxxx xxxxxx xx xxxxxxxxxx, xxx xxxxxxxxx xx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xx xxxxxxx xx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxx & xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx Upgrade to access Booking.com’s case study.
First benchmarked in April 2022, and reviewed 2 times since then, most recently in December 2025.
Booking.com’s UX Performance upgrade

Benchmark Chart
This UX performance chart is part of Baymard's premium UX research. Create a free account to preview selected research, or compare plans to unlock full access for your team.
Included with access
To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.
Industry Comparison
The broader travel accommodations industry generally paired solid entry points and stable booking mechanics with weaker support for comparison, cost verification, and post-booking …
18 pages of Booking.com’s ecommerce site, marked up with 151 best practice examples:
17 pages of Booking.com’s ecommerce site, marked up with 157 best practice examples:
20 pages of Booking.com’s ecommerce site, marked up with 138 best practice examples:
Every week, we publish a new article on how to build “state of the art” ecommerce experiences — here’s 5 popular ones:

Drop-Down Usability: When You Should (and Shouldn’t) Use Them

Format the “Expiration Date” Fields Exactly the Same as the Physical Credit Card (72% Don’t)

Avoid Using “Horizontal Tabs” for the Main Product Page Sections (29% Don’t)

Form Field Usability: Avoid Extensive Multicolumn Layouts (16% Make This Form Usability Mistake)

Form Usability: Getting ‘Address Line 2’ Right
See all 456 articles in the full public archive.