This is a case study of Grammarly’s e-commerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 247 design elements. 213 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the e-commerce UX landscape.
Grammarly’s overall e-commerce UX performance is decent. However, Grammarly’s UX performance suffers from broken Homepage & Navigation.
Overall UX Performance
255 Guidelines · Performance:
Desktop Web
152 Guidelines · Performance:
Homepage & Navigation
24 Guidelines · Performance:
Page Types & Design
17 Guidelines · Performance:
Plan Matrix
8 Guidelines · Performance:
Checkout
77 Guidelines · Performance:
Sign-Up & Account Management
12 Guidelines · Performance:
Site-Wide Features & Navigation
14 Guidelines · Performance:
Mobile Web
103 Guidelines · Performance:
To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.
The scatterplot you see above is the free version we make public to all our users. If you wish to dive deeper and learn about each guideline and even review your own site you’ll need to get premium access.
9 pages of Grammarly’s e-commerce site, marked up with 96 best practice examples:
5 pages of Grammarly’s e-commerce site, marked up with 60 best practice examples:
Explore similar case studies of Digital Subscriptions & SaaS sites:
26 page designs: desktop, mobile
22 page designs: desktop, mobile
21 page designs: desktop, mobile
24 page designs: desktop, mobile
24 page designs: desktop, mobile
17 page designs: desktop, mobile
19 page designs: desktop, mobile
21 page designs: desktop, mobile
Every 2nd week, we publish a new article on how to build “state of the art” e-commerce experiences — here’s 5 popular ones:
See all 363 articles in the full public archive.