Hibbett’s E-Commerce UX
This is a case study of Hibbett’s e-commerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 252 design elements. 213 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the e-commerce UX landscape.
Hibbett’s overall e-commerce UX performance is poor. Hibbett’s UX performance in particular suffers from usability issues caused by broken On-Site Search, Mobile On-Site Search, and Accounts & Self-Service.
Desktop Web
252 Guidelines · Performance:
Homepage & Category Navigation
29 Guidelines · Performance:
On-Site Search
23 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Lists & Filtering
51 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Page
60 Guidelines · Performance:
Cart & Checkout
71 Guidelines · Performance:
Accounts & Self-Service
18 Guidelines · Performance:
Mobile Web
251 Guidelines · Performance:
To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.
The scatterplot you see above is the free version we make public to all our users. If you wish to dive deeper and learn about each guideline and even review your own site you’ll need to get premium access.
Hibbett’s Desktop Web E-Commerce Design
24 pages of Hibbett’s e-commerce site, marked up with 188 best practice examples:
Hibbett’s Mobile Web E-Commerce Design
25 pages of Hibbett’s e-commerce site, marked up with 194 best practice examples:
Similar Case Studies
Explore similar case studies of Sports Gear & Equipment sites:
43 page designs: desktop, mobile
43 page designs: desktop, mobile
39 page designs: desktop, mobile
40 page designs: mobile, desktop
38 page designs: desktop, mobile
53 page designs: mobile, desktop
46 page designs: mobile, desktop
40 page designs: desktop, mobile
Explore Other Research Content
Every 2nd week, we publish a new article on how to build “state of the art” e-commerce experiences — here’s 5 popular ones:
See all 367 articles in the full public archive.