This is a case study of SportChek’s e-commerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 252 design elements. 213 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the e-commerce UX landscape.
SportChek’s overall e-commerce UX performance is mediocre. Their main culprits are broken Accounts & Self-Service, broken Accounts & Self-Service, and poor Mobile Product Lists & Filtering performances.
252 Guidelines · Performance:
Homepage & Category Navigation
29 Guidelines · Performance:
23 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Lists & Filtering
51 Guidelines · Performance:
60 Guidelines · Performance:
Cart & Checkout
71 Guidelines · Performance:
Accounts & Self-Service
18 Guidelines · Performance:
251 Guidelines · Performance:
To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.
The scatterplot you see above is the free version we make public to all our users. If you wish to dive deeper and learn about each guideline and even review your own site you’ll need to get premium access.
20 pages of SportChek’s e-commerce site, marked up with 193 best practice examples:
20 pages of SportChek’s e-commerce site, marked up with 196 best practice examples:
Explore similar case studies of Sports Gear & Equipment sites:
Every 2nd week, we publish a new article on how to build “state of the art” e-commerce experiences — here’s 5 popular ones:
See all 363 articles in the full public archive.