Benchmarks

H&M’s E-Commerce UX

This is a case study of H&M’s e-commerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 862 design elements. 213 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the e-commerce UX landscape.

H&M’s overall e-commerce UX performance is mediocre. It is especially issues related to broken Order Tracking & Returns and poor Customer Accounts that detract from H&M’s UX performance.

First benchmarked in May 15, 2017, and reviewed 20 times since then, most recently December 5, 2022.


Performance: 37.2Mediocre

URL: www2.hm.com/en_gb/index.html


Get Premium Research Access

Poor
Mediocre
Decent
Good
Perfect

Overall UX Performance

866 Guidelines · Performance:

Desktop Web

482 Guidelines · Performance:

Homepage & Category

54 Guidelines · Performance:

On-Site Search

47 Guidelines · Performance:

Product Lists & Filtering

90 Guidelines · Performance:

Product Page

96 Guidelines · Performance:

Cart & Checkout

130 Guidelines · Performance:

Customer Accounts

38 Guidelines · Performance:

Order Tracking & Returns

27 Guidelines · Performance:

Mobile Web

384 Guidelines · Performance:

Poor
Mediocre
Decent
Good
Perfect

Mobile App

364 Guidelines · Performance:

To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.

The scatterplot you see above is the free version we make public to all our users. If you wish to dive deeper and learn about each guideline and even review your own site you’ll need to get premium access.





Similar Case Studies

Explore similar case studies of Apparel & Accessories sites: