This is a case study of Adidas’ e-commerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 836 design elements. 213 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the e-commerce UX landscape.
Adidas’ overall e-commerce UX performance is decent. Their main culprits are broken Customer Accounts performance.
First benchmarked in May 15, 2017, and reviewed 18 times since then, most recently November 18, 2022.
Overall UX Performance
866 Guidelines · Performance:
Desktop Web
482 Guidelines · Performance:
Homepage & Category
54 Guidelines · Performance:
On-Site Search
47 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Lists & Filtering
90 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Page
96 Guidelines · Performance:
Cart & Checkout
130 Guidelines · Performance:
Customer Accounts
38 Guidelines · Performance:
Order Tracking & Returns
27 Guidelines · Performance:
Mobile Web
384 Guidelines · Performance:
To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.
The scatterplot you see above is the free version we make public to all our users. If you wish to dive deeper and learn about each guideline and even review your own site you’ll need to get premium access.
22 pages of Adidas’ e-commerce site, marked up with 313 best practice examples:
18 pages of Adidas’ e-commerce site, marked up with 267 best practice examples:
Explore similar case studies of Apparel & Accessories sites:
31 page designs: desktop, mobile
32 page designs: desktop, mobile
35 page designs: desktop, mobile
32 page designs: desktop, mobile
33 page designs: desktop, mobile
75 page designs: app, mobile, desktop
73 page designs: desktop, mobile, app
44 page designs: desktop, mobile
Every 2nd week, we publish a new article on how to build “state of the art” e-commerce experiences — here’s 5 popular ones:
See all 363 articles in the full public archive.