This is a case study of HP’s e-commerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 863 design elements. 213 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the e-commerce UX landscape.
HP’s overall e-commerce UX performance is mediocre. HP’s UX performance in particular suffers from usability issues caused by poor Customer Accounts, Product Page, and Order Tracking & Returns.
First benchmarked in April 7, 2012, and reviewed 25 times since then, most recently May 29, 2023.
Overall UX Performance
866 Guidelines · Performance:
Desktop Web
482 Guidelines · Performance:
Homepage & Category
54 Guidelines · Performance:
On-Site Search
47 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Lists & Filtering
90 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Page
96 Guidelines · Performance:
Cart & Checkout
130 Guidelines · Performance:
Customer Accounts
38 Guidelines · Performance:
Order Tracking & Returns
27 Guidelines · Performance:
Mobile Web
384 Guidelines · Performance:
To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.
The scatterplot you see above is the free version we make public to all our users. If you wish to dive deeper and learn about each guideline and even review your own site you’ll need to get premium access.
25 pages of HP’s e-commerce site, marked up with 352 best practice examples:
21 pages of HP’s e-commerce site, marked up with 276 best practice examples:
Explore similar case studies of Electronics & Office sites:
24 page designs: desktop, mobile
25 page designs: desktop, mobile
53 page designs: mobile, desktop
56 page designs: mobile, desktop
50 page designs: mobile, desktop
20 page designs: desktop, mobile
52 page designs: mobile, desktop
52 page designs: mobile, desktop
Every 2nd week, we publish a new article on how to build “state of the art” e-commerce experiences — here’s 5 popular ones:
See all 363 articles in the full public archive.