Dick’s Sporting Goods’ E-Commerce UX

This is a case study of Dick’s Sporting Goods’ e-commerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 580 design elements. 213 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the e-commerce UX landscape.

Dick’s Sporting Goods’ overall e-commerce UX performance is mediocre. It is especially issues related to poor Customer Accounts, poor On-Site Search, and mediocre Product Page that detract from Dick’s Sporting Goods’ UX performance.

First benchmarked in May 25, 2014, and reviewed 7 times since then, most recently June 1, 2023.

Performance: 31.7Mediocre

URL: dickssportinggoods.com

Get Premium Research Access

Poor

Mediocre

Decent

Good

Perfect

Overall UX Performance

832 Guidelines · Performance:

Desktop Web

458 Guidelines · Performance:

Homepage & Category

31 Guidelines · Performance:

On-Site Search

46 Guidelines · Performance:

Product Lists & Filtering

85 Guidelines · Performance:

Product Page

101 Guidelines · Performance:

Cart & Checkout

118 Guidelines · Performance:

Customer Accounts

38 Guidelines · Performance:

Site-Wide Features

12 Guidelines · Performance:

Order Tracking & Returns

27 Guidelines · Performance:

Mobile Web

374 Guidelines · Performance:

133 Major E-Commerce Sites

CompareWhat’s This?

To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.

The scatterplot you see above is the free version we make public to all our users. If you wish to dive deeper and learn about each guideline and even review your own site you’ll need to get premium access.