This is a case study of Fitbit’s e-commerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 485 design elements. 213 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the e-commerce UX landscape.
Fitbit’s overall e-commerce UX performance is mediocre. This is mainly due to poor Product Page and mediocre Mobile Web performances.
Overall UX Performance
485 Guidelines · Performance:
Desktop Web
294 Guidelines · Performance:
Homepage & Category
38 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Lists & Filtering
48 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Page
64 Guidelines · Performance:
Cart & Checkout
110 Guidelines · Performance:
Customer Accounts
34 Guidelines · Performance:
Mobile Web
191 Guidelines · Performance:
To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.
The scatterplot you see above is the free version we make public to all our users. If you wish to dive deeper and learn about each guideline and even review your own site you’ll need to get premium access.
16 pages of Fitbit’s e-commerce site, marked up with 210 best practice examples:
9 pages of Fitbit’s e-commerce site, marked up with 147 best practice examples:
Explore similar case studies of Electronics & Office sites:
24 page designs: desktop, mobile
53 page designs: mobile, desktop
46 page designs: mobile, desktop
56 page designs: mobile, desktop
50 page designs: mobile, desktop
20 page designs: desktop, mobile
52 page designs: mobile, desktop
52 page designs: mobile, desktop
Every 2nd week, we publish a new article on how to build “state of the art” e-commerce experiences — here’s 5 popular ones:
See all 368 articles in the full public archive.