This is a case study of Sigma Aldrich’s e-commerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 500 design elements. 213 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the e-commerce UX landscape.
Sigma Aldrich’s overall e-commerce UX performance is poor. Some of Sigma Aldrich’s biggest UX issues are caused by broken Cart & Checkout, poor Mobile Web, and poor Homepage & Category performances.
Overall UX Performance
500 Guidelines · Performance:
Desktop Web
296 Guidelines · Performance:
Homepage & Category
31 Guidelines · Performance:
On-Site Search
32 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Lists & Filtering
53 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Page
48 Guidelines · Performance:
Cart & Checkout
106 Guidelines · Performance:
Customer Accounts
26 Guidelines · Performance:
Mobile Web
204 Guidelines · Performance:
To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.
The scatterplot you see above is the free version we make public to all our users. If you wish to dive deeper and learn about each guideline and even review your own site you’ll need to get premium access.
22 pages of Sigma Aldrich’s e-commerce site, marked up with 202 best practice examples:
15 pages of Sigma Aldrich’s e-commerce site, marked up with 153 best practice examples:
Explore similar case studies of B2B Medical & Pharma sites:
38 page designs: desktop, mobile
38 page designs: desktop, mobile
35 page designs: desktop, mobile
26 page designs: desktop, mobile
36 page designs: desktop, mobile
46 page designs: desktop, mobile
42 page designs: desktop, mobile
40 page designs: desktop, mobile
Every 2nd week, we publish a new article on how to build “state of the art” e-commerce experiences — here’s 5 popular ones:
See all 363 articles in the full public archive.