This is a case study of Thermo Fisher’s e-commerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 271 design elements. 148 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the e-commerce UX landscape.
Thermo Fisher’s overall e-commerce UX performance is poor. Their UX is especially thwarted by usability issues related to broken Cart & Checkout, Homepage & Category, and Mobile-Commerce performances. That said, their site performs great within Accounts & Self Service.
Overall UX Performance
271 Guidelines · Performance:
Homepage & Category
24 Guidelines · Performance:
16 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Lists & Filtering
36 Guidelines · Performance:
25 Guidelines · Performance:
Cart & Checkout
34 Guidelines · Performance:
Accounts & Self Service
19 Guidelines · Performance:
117 Guidelines · Performance:
To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.
The scatterplot you see above is the free version we make public to all our users. If you wish to dive deeper and learn about each guideline and even review your own site you’ll need to get premium access.
24 pages of Thermo Fisher’s e-commerce site, marked up with 111 best practice examples:
14 pages of Thermo Fisher’s e-commerce site, marked up with 99 best practice examples:
Explore similar case studies of Business-to-Business sites:
Every 2nd week, we publish a new article on how to build “state of the art” e-commerce experiences — here’s 5 popular ones:
See all319articles in the full public archive.