This is a case study of Thermo Fisher’s e-commerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 500 design elements. 213 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the e-commerce UX landscape.
Thermo Fisher’s overall e-commerce UX performance is poor. Their UX is especially thwarted by usability issues related to broken Cart & Checkout, broken Customer Accounts, and poor Product Page performances.
Overall UX Performance
500 Guidelines · Performance:
Desktop Web
296 Guidelines · Performance:
Homepage & Category
31 Guidelines · Performance:
On-Site Search
32 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Lists & Filtering
53 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Page
48 Guidelines · Performance:
Cart & Checkout
106 Guidelines · Performance:
Customer Accounts
26 Guidelines · Performance:
Mobile Web
204 Guidelines · Performance:
To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.
The scatterplot you see above is the free version we make public to all our users. If you wish to dive deeper and learn about each guideline and even review your own site you’ll need to get premium access.
25 pages of Thermo Fisher’s e-commerce site, marked up with 215 best practice examples:
17 pages of Thermo Fisher’s e-commerce site, marked up with 163 best practice examples:
Explore similar case studies of B2B Medical & Pharma sites:
38 page designs: desktop, mobile
38 page designs: desktop, mobile
37 page designs: desktop, mobile
35 page designs: desktop, mobile
26 page designs: desktop, mobile
36 page designs: desktop, mobile
46 page designs: desktop, mobile
40 page designs: desktop, mobile
Every 2nd week, we publish a new article on how to build “state of the art” e-commerce experiences — here’s 5 popular ones:
See all 363 articles in the full public archive.