Arrow’s E-Commerce UX

This is a case study of Arrow’s e-commerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 460 design elements. 213 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the e-commerce UX landscape.

Arrow’s overall e-commerce UX performance is poor. Their UX is especially thwarted by usability issues related to broken Customer Accounts, On-Site Search, and Cart & Checkout performances.

Performance: 2.4Poor


Get Premium Research Access


Overall UX Performance

463 Guidelines · Performance:

Desktop Web

265 Guidelines · Performance:

Homepage & Category

36 Guidelines · Performance:

On-Site Search

31 Guidelines · Performance:

Product Lists & Filtering

37 Guidelines · Performance:

Product Page

35 Guidelines · Performance:

Cart & Checkout

104 Guidelines · Performance:

Customer Accounts

22 Guidelines · Performance:

Mobile Web

198 Guidelines · Performance:

To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.

The scatterplot you see above is the free version we make public to all our users. If you wish to dive deeper and learn about each guideline and even review your own site you’ll need to get premium access.

Similar Case Studies

Explore similar case studies of B2B Components & Machinery sites: