Benchmarks

TigerDirect UX Case Study

This is a case study of TigerDirect’s e-commerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 384 design elements. 250 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the e-commerce UX landscape.

TigerDirect’s overall e-commerce UX performance is poor. Their UX is especially thwarted by usability issues related to poor Desktop Web performance.

First benchmarked in December 2013, and reviewed 14 times since then, most recently in December 2020.


Performance11.6Poor

URLtigerdirect.com


Get Premium Research Access

Poor
Mediocre
Decent
Good
Perfect

Overall UX Performance

601 Guidelines · Performance:

Desktop Web

299 Guidelines · Performance:

Mobile Web

302 Guidelines · Performance:

138 Major E-Commerce Sites
CompareWhat’s This?

To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.

The scatterplot you see above is the free version we make public to all our users. If you wish to dive deeper and learn about each guideline and even review your own site you’ll need to get premium access.