This is a case study of Target’s e-commerce user experience (UX) performance. It’s based on an exhaustive performance review of 1175 design elements. 213 other sites have also been benchmarked for a complete picture of the e-commerce UX landscape.
Target’s overall e-commerce UX performance is mediocre. This is mainly due to perfect Site-Wide Features and good On-Site Search while simultaneously having broken Homepage & Category and poor Customer Accounts.
First benchmarked in April 7, 2012, and reviewed 28 times since then, most recently June 12, 2023.
Overall UX Performance
1196 Guidelines · Performance:
458 Guidelines · Performance:
Homepage & Category
31 Guidelines · Performance:
46 Guidelines · Performance:
Product Lists & Filtering
85 Guidelines · Performance:
101 Guidelines · Performance:
Cart & Checkout
118 Guidelines · Performance:
38 Guidelines · Performance:
12 Guidelines · Performance:
Order Tracking & Returns
27 Guidelines · Performance:
374 Guidelines · Performance:
364 Guidelines · Performance:
To learn how we calculate our performance scores and read up on our evaluation criteria and scoring algorithm head over to our Methodology page.
The scatterplot you see above is the free version we make public to all our users. If you wish to dive deeper and learn about each guideline and even review your own site you’ll need to get premium access.
34 pages of Target’s e-commerce site, marked up with 382 best practice examples:
23 pages of Target’s e-commerce site, marked up with 300 best practice examples:
24 pages of Target’s e-commerce site, marked up with 276 best practice examples:
Explore similar case studies of Mass Merchant sites:
Every 2nd week, we publish a new article on how to build “state of the art” e-commerce experiences — here’s 5 popular ones:
See all 363 articles in the full public archive.